-
Period: to
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v.. Rowley
Plaintiffs in disagreement over interpretation of IEP.
Defendants:Denied the arrangement set by the IEP.
Final court ruling: 458 U.S. 209 the Act does not require the provision of a sign-language interpreter. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/458/176/ -
Period: to
Sacramento City Unified Schools District, Board of Education v. Rachel Holland.
Plaintiff took legal action, Rachel be placed full time in a regular classroom for the 1989-90 school year.
Defendants responded, “Rachel was too severely disabled to benefit from full-time placement in a regular class.”
Final Court Ruling,"conflict is a continuing one and will arise" see
F.Supp.at 877n.4786
http://www.kidstogether.org/right-ed.htm -
Period: to
Endrew F., v. Douglas County School District RE
Petitioner Endrew, F.IEP did not meet up with the standards;taking legal action for tuition.
Defendants offered updated version IEP not good enough.
Final Court Ruling, The petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted.
Respectfully submitted.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2016/15-827